ABRAMS
v.
BARNETT, WARDEN
ABRAMS
BARNETT, WARDEN
521 U.S. 1114
Supreme Court of the United States (1997)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 527 U.S. 815 (U.S. 1999)…and had ignored a number of justiciability issues. See generally id., at 993-1026.11 Shortly thereafter, this Court decided Amchem and proceeded to vacate the Fifth Circuit’s judgment and remand for further consideration in light of that decision. 521 U. S. 1114 (1997). On remand, the Fifth Circuit again affirmed, in a brief per curiam opinion, distinguishing Amchem on the grounds that the instant action proceeded under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) rather than (b)(3), and did not allocate awards according to the nature…
-
In re Tousa, Inc. v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors, 680 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2012)…and burdens to the debtor, direct or indirect, including ‘indirect economic benefits.’ ” United States v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church (In re Young), 82 F. 3d 1407, 1415 (8th Cir.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted) vacated on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1114, 117 S.Ct. 2502, 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997). The district court also cited a decision by our Court that stated that Section 548(a) “does not authorize voiding a transfer which ‘confers an economic benefit upon the debtor,’ either directly or indirectl…