SILVER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE FOR THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY, ET AL.

v.

DIAZ ET AL.; ACOSTA ET AL. V. DIAZ ET AL.; AND LAU ET AL. V. DIAZ ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Provenzano v. Moore, 744 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1999)
  …ointing to Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981), Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997), Calamia v. Singletary, 520 U.S. 1141, 117 S.Ct. 1309, 137 L.Ed.2d 473 (1997), and Lancaster v. State, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 37, 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997). A great number of prisoners presently on death row have been sentenced to death by judgments which specify use of the electric chair because their sentences conformed with the existing law. All have been sentence…
• In re Senate Joint Resolution OF Legis. Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 2012)
  …nd the fact that incumbents were protected in 87% of the new districts, “[d]espite its conspicuous absence from any direct discussion, incumbency appears to have been the unacknowledged third-most-significant factor used when redistricting”), aff'd, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 36, [*618] 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997), and aff'd sub nom. Acosta v. Diaz, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 86, 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997), and aff'd sub nom. Lau v. Diaz, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 36, 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997). One piece of evidence in isolation may…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Donovan v. Moore, 755 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2000)
  …damus. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, section 3(b)(8), Fla. Const. This is a gain time case related to our decision in State v. Lancaster, 687 So. 2d 1299 (Fla.1997), which was vacated by the United States Supreme Court. See Lancaster v. Florida, 522 U.S. 801, 118 S.Ct. 37, 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997). On remand, we reconsidered the case in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997), and decided it in accordance with that decision.…