DUENAS, AKA KELLY
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1997-10-06
No. 97-5652
522 U.S. 902 Supreme Court of the United States (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Terrill Alexander v. State, 902 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …ment actors so as to subject them to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. We agree. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 487-89, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); United States v. Shakid, 117 F. 3d 322 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 902, 118 S.Ct. 254, 139 L.Ed.2d 182 (1997); United States v. Francoeur, 547 F. 2d 891 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 932, 97 S.Ct. 2640, 53 L.Ed.2d 249 (1977); State v. Olsen, 745 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Treadway v. State, 534 So. 2d 825…
  • United States v. Alas, 196 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 1999)
    …y 3, 1997, he should not be responsible for the value of the checks cashed during that time period. We review the validity of a restitution order for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Twitty, 107 F. 3d 1482, 1493 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 902, 118 S.Ct. 253, 139 L.Ed.2d 181 (1997). Upon review of the Presentence Investigation Report, the sentencing hearing transcript, and upon consideration of both parties’ briefs, we find no reversible error, and AFFIRM. Alas claims that he should not…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw