IN RE HUTCHINSON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HUTCHINSON, DECEASED; IN RE GOWING; AND IN RE WAPNICK

Citator

Cited By

• Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637 (U.S. 1998)
  …t did not, therefore, need authorization to file the petition in the District Court. It accordingly transferred the petition that had been presented to a member of that court back to the District Court. 118 F. 3d, at 634-635. We granted certiorari, 522 U. S. 912 (1997), to resolve an apparent conflict between the Ninth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit on this important question of federal law. See, e. g., In re Medina, 109 F. 3d 1556 (CA11 1996). Before reaching the question presented, however, we must fir…
• Beach et ux. v. Ocwen Fed. Bank, 523 U.S. 410 (U.S. 1998)
  …hey involved statutes of limitation, not statutes extinguishing rights defensively asserted. Because the reading of § 1635(f) given by the Supreme Court of Florida conflicts with the decisions of several other [*415] courts,5 we granted certiorari, 522 U. S. 912 (1997), to determine whether under federal law the statutory right of rescission provided by §1635 may be revived as an affirmative defense after its expiration under § 1635(f). We affirm. II The Beaches concede that any right they may have had to…
• Montana v. Crow Tribe OF Indians, 523 U.S. 696 (U.S. 1998)
  ….” Id., at 830; see also ibid. (‘Westmoreland was willing to pay coal taxes to the Tribe as early as 1976, so there was no reason for the [District Court] to distinguish between the taxes collected before and after 1982.”).13 We granted certiorari, 522 U. S. 912 (1997), and now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. II A The petition for certiorari presents the question whether the Tribe — or the United States as its trustee — may recover state and county taxes imposed on and paid by the Tribe’s m…