GUTIERREZ RIVERA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Romines, 204 F.3d 1067 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …Brooks v. Britton, 669 F. 2d 665 (11th Cir.1982); Fed R.App. P. 4(b). Because Romines failed to object to the restitution order at sentencing, we review only for plain error. See United States v. Davis, 117 F. 3d 459, 462 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 940, 118 S.Ct. 355, 139 L.Ed.2d 276 (1997). Unfortunately for the planned sentence, plain error is present. The crime of conviction, for which Romines has been sentenced to serial periods of supervised release after his conspicuous failures to comply…
• Equal. Found. of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, 525 U.S. 943 (U.S. 1998)
  …e petition for certiorari. The Court’s action today should not be interpreted either as an independent construction of the charter or as an expression of its views about the underlying issues that the parties have debated at length. Brown v. Texas, 522 U. S. 940, 942 (1997) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Lackey v. Texas, 514 U. S. 1045, 1047 (1995); Barber v. Tennessee, 513 U. S. 1184 (1995) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari). The relevant amendment to the…
• Evans v. Stephens, 544 U.S. 942 (U.S. 2005)
  …ments made absent consent of the Senate during short intrasession “recesses.” See, e. g., Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. Cincinnati, 525 U. S. 943 (1998) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Brown v. Texas, 522 U. S. 940, 942 (1997) (same); Barber v. Tennessee, 513 U. S. 1184 (1995) (same); cf. Darr v. Burford, 339 U. S. 200, 227 (1950) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting) (“Nothing is more basic to the functioning of this Court than an understanding that denial of certior…