STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree validating a refunding bond and delinquent tax notes for the City of St. Augustine. The court found that all issues raised on appeal had been previously decided in prior cases and that the record contained no reversible error.
No, the lower court did not err. All questions presented by the appellant have been previously decided by this Court in prior cases, and the record contains no reversible error.
“Every question presented by the appellants has' been considered, discussed and decided contrary to the contentions of the appellant in cases heretofore presented to and determined by this Court.”
This quote establishes the core reasoning for the court's decision, indicating that the appeal raised no novel legal issues.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe City of St. Augustine sought to issue refunding bonds totaling $3,121,000.00 and delinquent tax notes for $255,000.00. The State of Florida appeal…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Refunding Bonds cases and more on FLexlaw
— The appeal brings for review a decree validating a refunding bond to be issued by the City of St. -Augustine, Florida, in the sum of $3,121,000.00 in series B, C, D, and E, and delinquent tax notes in the amount of $255,000.00, the latter in lieu of obligation for interest now outstanding.
*462The appellant has presented' twelve (12) questions fox our consideration. We have considered each of - the Questions presented and the transcript of the record in the light of such question.
Every question presented by the appellants has’ been considered, discussed and decided contrary to the contentions of the appellant in cases heretofore presented to and determined by this Court. The enunciations of the Court in such cases have been cited and copiously quoted front in the appellee’s brief. We apprehend that it can serve no useful purpose for us now to reiterate and reaffirm the' statements of law applicable to this case which have been definitely and clearly established by our opinions 'and judgments in former cases. It is, therefore, sufficient'-to say that an examination of the entire record discloses no reversible error and the decree appealed from should be’ and is now affirmed.
So ordered.
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.