MARTINEZ ET AL.

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Dooley v. State, 743 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …the United States Supreme Court held law enforcement officers could continue interrogating a suspect when there has been an equivocal assertion of the suspect’s Miranda rights. In State v. Owen, 696 So. 2d 715 (Fla.), cert. denied, Owen v. Florida, 522 U.S. 1002, 118 S.Ct. 574, 139 L.Ed.2d 413 (1997), the Florida Supreme Court adopted the ruling in Davis. Based upon Davis and Owen, the state argues that it was permissible for Sanchez to continue interrogating Dooley because he allegedly made an equivocal as…
• Bean v. State, 752 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …eafter must thereafter “clearly invoke” [*648] his right to counsel during the ensuing interview before questioning must cease. The Florida Supreme Court subsequently-adopted the Davis rationale in State v. Owen, 696 So. 2d 715 (Fla.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1002, 118 S.Ct. 574, 139 L.Ed.2d 413 (1997). Owen was recently explained and distinguished by the Florida Supreme Court in Almeida v. State, 737 So. 2d 520 (Fla.), petition for cert. filed, 68 U.S.L.W. 3368 (U.S.Fla. Nov. 24, 1999) (No. 99-903), which i…
• State v. Jayime Soto, 954 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …ions if a defendant who has received proper Miranda warnings makes only an equivocal or ambiguous request to terminate an interrogation after having validly waived ... Miranda rights.” [e.s.] State v. Owen, 696 So. 2d 715, 719 (Fla.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1002, 118 S.Ct. 574, 139 L.Ed.2d 413 (1997). Owen adopted part of the rationale in Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 460-61, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994) (if a suspect initially waives his or her rights, the suspect thereafter must clearly…