BRYAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184 (U.S. 1998)
  …th Circuit has held that it is necessary for the Government to prove that the defendant acted with knowledge of the licensing requirement, United States v. Sanchez-Corcino, 85 F. 3d 549, 553-554 (1996), we granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 522 U. S. 1024 (1997). [*191] H-i The word “willfully” is sometimes said to be “a word of many meanings” whose construction is often dependent on the context in which it appears. See, e. g., Spies v. United States, 317 U. S. 492, 497 (1943). Most obviously it dif…
• United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1998)
  …controlling the actions of its subsidiaries, since the parent and subsidiary corporations maintained separate personalities and the parents did not utilize the subsidiary corporate form to perpetrate fraud or subvert justice. We granted certiorari, 522 U. S. 1024 (1997), to resolve a conflict among the Circuits over the extent to which parent corporations may be held liable under CERCLA for operating facilities ostensibly under the control of their subsidiaries.8 We now vacate and remand. [*61] J — { H-1 H…
• Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Cent. Off. Tel., Inc., 524 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1998)
  …rate Judge’s failure to instruct on punitive damages and remanded for a trial on that aspect of the case. 108 F. 3d 981 (CA9 1997). We granted certiorari to determine whether the federal filed-rate requirements of § 203 pre-empt respondent’s claims. 522 U. S. 1024 (1997). 1 — t Section 203(a) of the Communications Act requires every common carrier to file with the FCC “schedules,” i e., tariffs, “showing all charges” and “showing the classifications, practices, and regulations affecting such charges.” 47 U.…