GOEWEY, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, GOEWEY, ET AL.

v.

FLUOR DANIEL, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2000)
  …1997) (prima facie ease combined with sufficient evidence to disbelieve employer’s explanation always creates jury issue of whether employer intentionally discriminated); Combs v. Plantation Patterns, 106 F. 3d 1519 (CA11 1997) (same), cert. denied, 522 U. S. 1045 (1998); Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F. 3d 1061 (CA3 1996) (same) (en bane), cert. denied, 521U. S. 1129 (1997); Gaworski v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 17 F. 3d 1104 (CA8) (same), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 946 (1994); Anderson v.…
• Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., 195 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …anting Judgments as a Matter of Law This Court reviews de novo a district court’s denial of a motion for judgment as a matter of law. Combs v. Plantation Patterns, 106 F. 3d 1519, 1526 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom. Combs v. Meadowcraft Co., 522 U.S. 1045, 118 S.Ct. 685, 139 L.Ed.2d 632 (1998). We employ the same standard the district court applied, “reviewing] all of the evidence in the light most favorable to, and with all reasonable inferences drawn in favor of, the nonmoving party.” Walker v. Nat…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Palmer v. Bd. OF Regents OF THE Univ. Sys. OF Ga., 208 F.3d 969 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …rate the existence of a genuine issue of fact as to the truth of each of the employer’s proffered reasons for its challenged action.” Combs v. Plantation Patterns, 106 F. 3d 1519, 1529 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom. Combs v. Meadowcraft Co., 522 U.S. 1045, 118 S.Ct. 685, 139 L.Ed.2d 632 (1998). Thus the ultimate question under these circumstances is to be resolved by a jury. The University System does not quarrel with these statements of law but maintains that the general instructions given by the t…