J. FORD LAUMER AND FRANCES H. LAUMER, PETITIONERS,

v.

GERALDINE H. SPACKMAN, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Elliot v. State, 704 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …ting his intention to detain defendant until arrested by other officers); State v. Padilla, 235 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 3d DCA) (flashing light into defendant’s car and requesting that he pull over insufficient to communicate fact of arrest), cert. denied, 239 So. 2d 830 (Fla.1970). We followed and applied the Melton line of cases in Brown v. State, 623 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So. 2d 627 (Fla.1994). In that ease, the defendant was charged with escaping after being arrested. The facts invo…
• Maesa v. Lopez, 400 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …driver’s obligation to have been aware of the pedestrian and of the pedestrian’s comparative negligence. Bilams v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, 371 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); see Spackman v. Laumer, 237 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 239 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1970). Because it is the traditional function of a jury to determine disputed issues of fact, the power to direct a verdict should be sparingly and cautiously exercised. If any reasonable theory of the evidence, including any lawful inferenc…

Authorities Cited

• Spackman v. Laumer, 237 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)