ROBERT WESLEY FOWLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Comity Between States cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant by motion filed in the trial court sought to dismiss a detainer lodged against him by the State of New Jersey State Parole Board.
The trial- court’s finding that “The validity of any alleged parole violation by Mr. Fowler is not a proper subject for this court to consider and must be decided by the appropriate court in the State of New Jersey,” and its order denying the petitioner’s motion “ * * * without prejudice to the said Fowler making a demand upon the appropriate authorities of the State of New Jersey for return to that state for the purpose of making a judicial determination as to the validity or invalidity of the detainer filed by the authorities of that state with the Division of Corrections of the State of Florida” properly disposed of the cause.
The judgment appealed is affirmed.
JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ringling BROS.-BARNUM & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. State, 295 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)…Films, Inc., Fla.App.3rd 1961, 133 So. 2d 431; Amelia Island Mosquito Control Dist. v. Tyson, Fla.App.lst 1963, 150 So. 2d 246; Morris v. Williams, Fla.App.2nd 1967, 199 So. 2d 747; Sage v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford, Fla.App.4th 1970, 239 So. 2d 831; and Department of Revenue v. First Fed. Sav. & L. Ass’n., Fla.App.2nd 1971, 256 So. 2d 524. The parties have also cited two United States Supreme Court cases, Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 80 S.Ct. 1084, 4 L.Ed.2d 1254; and Van Dusen v. Barrack,…
-
Coleman P. Houchins, Jr. v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 388 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…refiling in Dade. If a defendant seeks to be relieved from the plaintiff’s choice of forum, his exclusive remedy lies in demonstrating his entitlement to transfer under Chapter 47, Florida Statutes. Sage v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford, 239 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). If a defendant, as here, fails in that showing, the plaintiff’s choice of forum controls. A court cannot give the defendant greater rights than the legislature has seen fit to grant in this statutory scheme by pejoratively descr…
-
Walt Disney World Co. & Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Leff, 323 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)…73); Maloney v. Fleishaker, 238 So. 2d 496 (2nd DCAFla.1970); King v. King, 188 So. 2d 857 (4th DCAFla.1966), and was recognized by this court, but not applied because the facts did not so warrant, in Sage v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford, 239 So. 2d 831, 833 (4th DCA Fla.1970). Appellees make an unpersuasive attempt to distinguish the above cases on their facts from that at bar. Their argument is infected with a fallacious concept: that venue was properly laid in Broward County as to defendant-Dis…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence