UNITED STATES
v.
BALSYS
UNITED STATES
BALSYS
522 U.S. 1072
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Monge v. California, 524 U.S. 721 (U.S. 1998)…te conclusions as well. Compare, e. g., Briggs v. Procunier, 764 F. 2d 368, 371 (CA5 1985), with Denton v. Duckworth, 873 F. 2d 144 (CA7), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 941 (1989). In view of the conflicting authority on the issue, we granted certiorari, 522 U. S. 1072 (1998). HH The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides: “[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” We have previo…
-
United States v. Cabrales, 524 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1998)…9, 482 (CA4 1994); United States v. Beddow, 957 F. 2d 1330, 1335-1336 (CA6 1992); United States v. Sax, 39 F. 3d 1380, 1390-1391 (CA7 1994); United States v. Angotti, 105 F. 3d 539, 544-545 (CA9 1997)). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict, 522 U. S. 1072 (1998), and now affirm the Eighth Circuit’s judgment. r — 1 Proper venue in criminal proceedings was a matter of concern to the Nation’s founders. Their complaints against the King of Great Britain, listed in the Deelai’ation of Independence, incl…
-
United States v. Balsys, 524 U.S. 666 (U.S. 1998)…by a foreign country may assert the Fifth Amendment privilege to avoid giving testimony in a domestie [*671] proceeding, even if the witness has no valid fear of a criminal prosecution in this country. 119 F. 3d 122 (1997). We granted certiorari, 522 U. S. 1072 (1998), to resolve a conflict among the Circuits on this issue 2 and now reverse. I — [ HH The Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment provides that “[n]o person... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”…