IN RE HAMPEL ET VIR.

Citator

Cited By

• AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1999)
  …view of the Eighth Circuit’s holdings regarding jurisdiction, Rule 315(b), and the “pick and choose” rule; the incumbent LECs cross-petitioned for review of the Eighth Circuit’s treatment of the other unbundling issues. We granted all the petitions. 522 U. S. 1089 (1998). II Section 201(b), a 1938 amendment to the Communications Act of 1934, provides that “[t]he Commission may prescribe such rules and regulations as may be necessary in the public interest to carry out the provisions of this Act.” 52 Stat. 5…
• Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc. v. McImetro Access Transmission Servs., Inc., 278 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …til. Comm’n, 208 F. 3d 475, 479-480 (5th Cir.2000); Illinois Bell Tel. Co. v. Worldcom Techs., Inc., 179 F. 3d 566, 571-72 (7th Cir.1999); Iowa Util. Bd. v. F.C.C., 120 F. 3d 753, 804 (8th Cir.1997), rev’d on other grounds, AT & T v. Iowa Util. Bd., 522 U.S. 1089, 118 S.Ct. 879, 139 L.Ed.2d 867 (1998); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Brooks Fiber Optic Comm’n of Oklahoma, Inc., 235 F. 3d 493, 497 (10th Cir.2000). Thus, I believe that the Georgia Public Service Commission (“GPSC”) had the authority to accept,…