WALDAU
v.
COUGHLIN ET AL.
WALDAU
COUGHLIN ET AL.
522 U.S. 1113
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Buckley v. Am. Constitutional Law Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1999)…ess of obtaining thousands of signatures of only registered electors throughout the state.’” Id., at 1099-1100 (quoting Loonan v. Woodley, 882 P. 2d 1380, 1388-1389 (Colo. 1994) (en banc)). We denied ACLF’s cross-petition regarding these issues. See 522 U. S. 1113 (1998). Nothing in this opinion should be read to suggest that initiative-petition circulators are agents of the State. Although circulators are subject to state regulation and are accountable to the State for compliance with legitimate controls, s…