EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
CORAL GABLES FIRST NATIONAL BANK, A UNITED STATES BANKING CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-10-20
No. 70-301
Per Curiam
240 So. 2d 87 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Eastern Air Lines had no claim to funds held by Florida National Bank because the bank never accepted the checks Eastern presented, and an unaccepted check creates no liability on the drawee bank.


Holding

A drawee bank has no liability upon an unaccepted check, and therefore a party presenting unaccepted checks has no claim to funds held by that bank.


Headnotes

[1] A drawee bank incurs no liability on a check until it accepts the check, and therefore a party presenting unaccepted checks acquires no claim to funds held by the drawee…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Eastern Air Lines presented two checks from a malefactor to Florida National Bank for payment after the bank was notified of fraud but before service …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., was an additional party defendant to a proceeding in garnishment brought by the appellee, Coral Gables First National Bank, against the Florida National Bank and Trust Company. The garnishment was ancillary to an action to recover money paid out by Coral Gables First National Bank upon a forged check. The appellant claimed some interest in the money held by the Florida National Bank because it had pre*88sented two checks of the malefactor to Florida National Bank for payment. The checks were presented after notification to Florida National Bank of the fraud but before service of the writ of garnishment. Payment of the checks presented by Eastern Air Lines was refused.

The summary judgment is upon undisputed facts and implicitly holds that until a check is accepted by the drawee bank it has no liability upon the check. See § 673.3-409(1) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Because the drawee bank (Florida National) did not accept the checks held by Eastern Air Lines, Florida National had no liability upon the checks. Gartner v. American Nat. Bank of Jacksonville, Fla.1952, 58 So.2d 705; Elmore v. Palmer First Nat. B. & T. Co. of Sarasota, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 164. Florida National Bank had no liability upon the unaccepted checks and it held money of the Coral Gables First National Bank properly returnable to the Coral Gables Bank; therefore the appellant Eastern Air Lines had no claim to the money. Elmore v. Palmer First Nat. B. & T. Co. of Sarasota, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 164.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Peoples Bank IN N. Fort Myers v. BOB Lincoln, Inc., 283 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
    …s reliance on Elmore v. Palmer First Nat. B. & T. Co. of Sarasota, Fla.App.2d 1969, 221 So. 2d 164, Gartner v. American Nat. Bank of Jacksonville, Fla. 1952, 58 So. 2d 705, and Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Coral Gables First Nat. Bk., Fla.App.3d 1970, 240 So. 2d 87, is misplaced. Here is what Anderson says about Section 673.409: The two original sections are combined, 'brought forward to appear in connection with acceptance, and reworded to remove uncertainties. 1. As under the original sections, a check*or…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw