ARNOLD

v.

MOORE, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Vandiver Elizabeth Glenn v. Sewell R. Brumby, 663 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2011)
  …h he projected the sexual aspect of his personality (and by that we mean his gender) did not conform to his coworkers' view of appropriate masculine behavior.” Doe v. City of Belleville, 119 F. 3d 563, 580 (7th Cir.1997), vacated on other grounds by 523 U.S. 1001, 118 S.Ct. 1183, 140 L.Ed.2d 313 (1998). . In Nichols v. Azteca Restaurant Enterprises, the Ninth Circuit held that a waiter who was harassed by his co-workers for carrying a serving tray "like a woman” stated a claim for sexual harassment under Ti…
• Snider v. Jefferson State Cmty. Coll., 344 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …n public employment could violate the Equal Protection Clause, Doe by Doe v. City of Belleville, Ill., 119 F. 3d 563, 596-97 (7th Cir.1997), the decision was vacated by the Supreme Court less than eight months later, City of Belleview v. Doe by Doe, 523 U.S. 1001, 118 S.Ct. 1183, 140 L.Ed.2d 313 (1998). The Fourth Circuit had concluded that same-sex sexual harassment claims were not actionable under the Equal Protection Clause if the harassers and the victim were heterosexuals of the same sex. See McWillia…