KILLORAN, AKA GIBSON, AKA PROBERT

v.

UNITED STATES; AND LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (U.S. 1999)
  …Reports and floor debate on the bill to enhanced penalties for an apparently single carjacking offense. Ibid. Because of features arguably distinguishing this case from Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U. S. 224 (1998), we granted certiorari, 523 U. S. 1045 (1998), and now reverse. Much, turns on the determination that a fact is an element of an offense rather than a sentencing consideration, given that elements must be charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, and proven by the Government beyon…
• City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., 526 U.S. 687 (U.S. 1999)
  …eweigh the reasonableness of the city’s land-use decision, and (3) whether the Court of Appeals erred in assuming that the rough-proportionality standard of Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U. S. 374 (1994), applied to this ease. We granted certio-rari, 523 U. S. 1045 (1998), and now address these questions in reverse order. II In the course of holding a reasonable jury could have found the city’s denial of the final proposal not substantially related to legitimate public interests, the Court of Appeals stated:…
• Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (U.S. 1998)
  …pted rule, particularly given the importance of the privilege to full and frank client communication. Id., at 237. Petitioners sought review in this Court on both the attorney-client privilege and the work-product privilege.1 We granted certiorari, 523 U. S. 1045 (1998), and we now reverse. The attorney-client privilege is one of the oldest recognized privileges for confidential communications. Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U. S. 383, 389 (1981); Hunt v. Blackburn, 128 U. S. 464, 470 (1888). The privileg…