DEL O'NEAL, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Vill. INN Rest. & Gallagher-Bassett Servs., Inc. v. Aridi, 543 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …me Court decisions which, as the dissent points out, involved parties who were summoned to appear and who were not before the respective tribunals voluntarily. The Florida Supreme Court addressed the Stockham and Simkins decisions in Minor v. Minor, 240 So. 2d 301 (Fla.1970), and adhered to the Stockham decision and disapproved the result reached in Simkins. The Minor Court reviewed the United States Supreme Court decisions relied upon in Simkins and held that they did not require alteration of the Stockham d…
• City OF ST. Petersburg v. Houghton, 362 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …te the holding of our Supreme Court in Stockham, supra, . . . ” Page 747. Upon review by the Florida Supreme Court by writ of certiorari of our decision in Minor, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed Minor and disapproved Simkins. See Minor v. Minor, 240 So. 2d 301 (1970). In Mahne v. Mahne, 124 N.J.Super. 23, 304 A. 2d 577 (1973), the court cited, inter alia, both the Minor and Stockham cases. Adopting the views supported by the two Florida cases, the court quoted from Christenson v. Christenson, 281 Minn. 5…
• PRO v. PRO, 300 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …inquiry was reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence, and it was error not to require the husband either to answer the question as framed or to suffer sanctions. Stockham v. Stockham, Fla. 1964, 168 So. 2d 320; Minor v. Minor, Fla. 1970, 240 So. 2d 301. We are not unmindful of the decision of Vandervoort v. Vandervoort, Fla.App.1972, 265 So. 2d 77, which affirmed the trial judge’s holding that he had the discretion not to consider the issue of adultery as it might affect the award of alimony unde…