SAAVEDRA
v.
THOMAS, WARDEN, ET AL.
SAAVEDRA
THOMAS, WARDEN, ET AL.
523 U.S. 1127
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025)
-
Colby Rosenquist v. State, 769 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…ules. The court held that the term does not apply to statements made “in fulfillment of an agreed-to bargain.” 458 So. 2d at 228. This decision was relied upon and quoted recently in Wainwright v. State, 704 So. 2d 511, 514 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1127, 118 S.Ct. 1814, 140 L.Ed.2d 952 (1998). In that case, the supreme court held that when a plea is in the “performance stage,” the statements made by an individual are admissible. As in Wainwright, at the time Rosenquist made the incriminating statem…
-
Raulerson v. Warden, 928 F.3d 987 (11th Cir. 2019)…ed Raulerson’s convictions and sentences. See Raulerson, 491 S.E. 2d at 801 (citing Burgess v. State, 450 S.E. 2d 680 (Ga. 1994)). The Supreme Court of the United States denied Raulerson’s petition for a writ of certiorari. See Raulerson v. Georgia, 523 U.S. 1127 (1998). C. The State and Federal Habeas Proceedings After his direct appeal, Raulerson filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a Georgia superior court. He alleged that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance at the penalty phase of his…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence