COPLAN PIPE & SUPPLY CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BEN-FRIEDA CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-10-27
No. 70-500
Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.
240 So. 2d 501 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Peppercorn v. Bencini, 101 Fla. 446, 134 So. 490; 22 Fla.Jur., Mortgages, §§ 244, 248.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Coplan Pipe & Supply Co., Inc. v. Ben-Frieda Corp., 256 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …red the clerk of the court to cancel and discharge the mortgage involved. We affirm. In a prior appeal, the denial of Coplan’s motion for summary judgment had been affirmed in Coplan Pipe and Supply Co., Inc. v. Ben-Frieda Corporation, Fla.App.1970, 240 So. 2d 501. The issues raised on appeal concern conduct of the trial, defenses to the notes and extinguishment of the debt. On March 31, 1969, Dade Plumbing (not a party herein) executed as maker several promissory notes totaling $50,000.00 payable to Copian…
  • Kofoed Pub. Relations Assocs., Inc. v. Stimson, 35 Fla. Supp. 20 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1971)
    …Second District Court of Appeal appears to have taken the position expressed herein and disagreed with the majority view of his court that the Fountain case answered the question in issue in this case. Gulf Coast Refractory Services, Inc. v. Green, 240 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 2 App. 1970). Three judges of the First District Court of Appeal have taken the position that the Fountain case is to be limited to its facts. Inland Rubber Corp. v. Helman, 237 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1 App. 1970). The Supreme Court and Fourth Distr…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw