GLEASON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GLEASON, DECEASED
v.
NOYES ET AL.; SAID V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL; MAHER V. LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY ET AL.; PETERSON V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR AND HUMAN RELATIONS ET AL.; RIVERA V. FLORIDA; ALLARD V. ELO, WARDEN; FOLLETT V. ARIZONA; BROCKMAN V. SWEETWATER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1; BARRIER V. JOHNSON ET AL.; AND BARRIER V. MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL ET AL., IN RE GRIFFIN
GLEASON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GLEASON, DECEASED
NOYES ET AL.; SAID V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL; MAHER V. LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY ET AL.; PETERSON V. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR AND HUMAN RELATIONS ET AL.; RIVERA V. FLORIDA; ALLARD V. ELO, WARDEN; FOLLETT V. ARIZONA; BROCKMAN V. SWEETWATER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1; BARRIER V. JOHNSON ET AL.; AND BARRIER V. MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL ET AL., IN RE GRIFFIN
524 U.S. 933
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kelly v. Duggan, 282 So. 3d 969 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)…utory damages of $1,000 and other monetary damages under section 559.77(2), Florida Statutes. Duggan moved to dismiss the complaint citing Bryan v. Clayton, 698 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 707 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 1998), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 933 (1998), which held that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the FCCPA's definition of “debt” excludes maintenance assessments owed to a homeowner's association. Based on Bryan, the trial court dismissed the complaint. This appeal fo…
-
Clayton v. Bryan, 753 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…action and this court affirmed that dismissal based on the conclusion that the FDCPA does not apply to condominium maintenance assessments. Bryan v. Clayton, 698 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 707 So. 2d 1123 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 933, 118 S.Ct. 2334, 141 L.Ed.2d 706 (1998). C & M thereafter sought an award of its fees in the trial court. Resisting C & M’s quest for attorney’s fees, the Bryans asserted both that C & M’s offer of judgment had not been made in good faith and that…