DICKEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Olmsted v. Emmanuel, 783 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …re [*1128] taliation was in response to complaints about employment practices that discriminated against a minority, rather than because of his race. In Reynolds v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 115 F. 3d 860 (11th Cir.1997), cert. granted and vacated, 524 U.S. 947, 118 S.Ct. 2364, 141 L.Ed.2d 732 (1998), which was decided some five months after Little, even though the plaintiff was black, the court expressly “decline[d] to address whether [her] claims [we]re of the type that are cognizable under § 1981 as ame…
• Eliuth M. Alvarez v. Royal Atl. Developers, Inc., 610 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2010)
  …thout pay for 37 days was materially adverse even though employee later received back pay); Reynolds v. CSX Transp., Inc., 115 F. 3d 860, 868 (11th Cir.1997) (concluding that “almost a week” without pay was adverse action), vacated on other grounds, 524 U.S. 947, 118 S.Ct. 2364, 141 L.Ed.2d 732 (1998). The district court concluded that Alvarez’s retaliation claim failed because Royal Atlantic offered several legitimate reasons, other than her letter of complaint, that caused it to fire Alvarez. Among the r…