MALPESO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lowell E. Roberts, 308 F.3d 1147 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …endment does not guarantee a right to freedom from compulsion; rather, it ensures a right to freedom from criminal punishment based on compelled testimony. United States v. Gecas, 120 F. 3d 1419, 1429 & n. 13 (11th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 951, 118 S.Ct. 2365, 141 L.Ed.2d 735 (1998). Appellant failed to assert Ms Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination; in other words, the court did not unconstitutionally compel him to incriminate himself. The fatal variance. The indictment…
• Dep't of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc., 525 U.S. 255 (U.S. 1999)
  …gress had waived the Army’s sovereign immunity from Blue Fox’s suit. Ibid. The Government petitioned for review, and we granted certiorari to decide whether the APA has [*260] waived the Government’s immunity from suits to enforce an equitable lien. 524 U. S. 951 (1998). "Absent a waiver, sovereign immunity shields the Federal Government and its agencies from suit.” FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U. S. 471, 475 (1994). Congress, of course, has waived its immunity for a wide range of suits, including those that seek tra…