RICHARDSON
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1998-10-05
No. 97-8629
525 U.S. 809 Supreme Court of the United States (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1999)
    …addition, the Fourth Circuit concluded that petitioner’s claim was, “in any event, without merit.” App. 418, n. 8.1 Finding the legal question presented by this [*266] case considerably more difficult than the Fourth Circuit, we granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 809 (1998), to consider (1) whether the Commonwealth violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963), and its progeny; (2) whether there was an acceptable “cause” for petitioner’s failure to raise this claim in state court; and (3), if so, whether he su…
  • Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1999)
    …Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in this case, 525 U. S. 809 (1998), to decide whether a prosecutor violates an attorney’s Fourteenth Amendment right to practice his profession when the prosecutor causes the attorney to be searched at the same time his client is testifying before a grand jury. We eonelude [*2…
  • Jones v. United States, 527 U.S. 373 (U.S. 1999)
    …tion would automatically result in a court-imposed sentence less severe than life imprisonment. 3. Whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that the submission of invalid nonstatutory aggravating factors was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” 525 U. S. 809 (1998); see also Brief for United States I. I think it fair and “‘principled,’” ante, at 402, to read the indigent petitioner’s arguments on the questions presented with the willingness to overlook “loose drafting” that the Court consistently shows…
    1 / 3

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw