RODRIGUEZ ET AL.
v.
FAIR, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, FOY
RODRIGUEZ ET AL.
FAIR, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, FOY
525 U.S. 811
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Warner v. City OF Boca Raton, 887 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 2004)…ficials.”); In re Young, 141 F. 3d 854, 863 (8th Cir.) ("Because the portion of RFRA applicable to federal law violates neither the separation of powers doctrine nor the Establishment Clause, we conclude that RFRA is constitutional.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 811, 119 S.Ct. 43, 142 L.Ed.2d 34 (1998). . As we noted in Malicki v. Doe, 814 So. 2d 347, 355, 355 n. 5 (Fla.2002), a claim that a law violates the Establishment Clause is assessed under the three-part test announced by the United States Supreme Court…
-
Rigoberto Sanchez-Velasco v. Sec'y OF THE Dep't OF Corr., 287 F.3d 1015 (11th Cir. 2002)…sel and post-conviction proceedings complied with the requirements it had set forth in Durocher v. Singletary, 623 So. 2d 482 (Fla.1993). The United States Supreme Court denied cer-tiorari review in October of 1998. See Sanchez-Velasco v. Florida, 525 U.S. 811, 119 S.Ct. 42, 142 L.Ed.2d 33 (1998). C. The Federal Habeas Petition In December 1998 Todd Scher, in his position as an attorney with CCRC, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The conflict of interest that had pr…