CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, TEOBALDO DE LAS CASAS AND LES VIOLINS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONERS,

v.

DIANE RAMY, INTERNATIONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND ROLANDO PELAYO CUERVO, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc., 368 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …alcedo appealed. We reverse. It is apparent to us that an application of the most elementary principles of equity and “good conscience,” Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Ins. Co. v. Griffin, 237 So. 2d 38, 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), cert. denied, 240 So. 2d 641 (Fla.1970), requires that the judgment below be set aside. The defendant, after securing the dismissal of a timely-filed action by successfully contending that the case must be submitted to medical mediation, has now successfully argued — directly t…
• Royal v. Parado, 462 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …oreover, prejudice may occur when a party is allowed to occupy inconsistent positions on the factual and legal issues pursued. See, Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Insurance Co. v. Griffin, 237 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), cert. dismissed, 240 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1970). Since appellee withdrew her claim on the record at the outset of the trial, appellants had no opportunity or apparent need to offer evidence or give argument on the mortgage payment issue, and therefore were prejudiced by the trial cour…
• NOA v. United GAS Pipeline Co., 305 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1974)
  …on of the device as defined in plain language by the Legislature and the Public Service Commission. Instead, Respondent asserts that the controlling law is found in Consolidated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ramy (Fla.App.1970), 238 So. 2d 431, cert. den. 240 So. 2d 641, holding that testimony of expert witnesses is generally confined to matters of fact rather than matters of law (such as a definition of a statutory term). Respondent goes on to factually distinguish the LeMay case, supra, relying instead on Cash v.…

Authorities Cited

• Consol. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ramy, 238 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)