MURRAY

v.

ALFORD, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Mansfield v. State, 758 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2000)
  …ichael Johns about what he did to the victim shows that he was keenly aware of what he was doing. The trial court’s decision in this regard is consistent with this Court’s decision in Raleigh v. State, 705 So. 2d 1324, 1330 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 841, 119 S.Ct. 105, 142 L.Ed.2d 84 (1998), where we found no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to assign little weight to the proposed voluntary intoxication miti- [*647] gator based largely on evidence of the defendant’s competence and…
• Akeem Muhammad v. State, 782 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2001)
  …he imposition of the death penalty. Based on the totality of the record in this case, we do not find that the trial court abused its discretion in excusing the juror for cause. See San Martin v. State, 705 So. 2d 1337, 1343 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 841, 119 S.Ct. 105, 142 L.Ed.2d 84 (1998); Reaves v. State, 639 So. 2d 1, 4 (Fla.1994); Randolph v. State, 562 So. 2d 331, 337 (Fla.1990). C. Proceeding Regarding a Witness Held Outside the Defendant’s Presence In this point on appeal, Muhammad claims…
• Kayle Barrington Bates v. State, 750 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1999)
  …sserts that he was denied a fair trial under the United States Constitution. Appellant cites to Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), for support. In San Martin v. State, 705 So. 2d 1337, 1347 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 841, 119 S.Ct. 105, 142 L.Ed.2d 84 (1998), we held with respect to the appointment of experts: In evaluating whether there was an abuse of discretion courts have applied a two-part test: (1) whether the defendant made a particularized showing of need;…