GEORGE CLINTON NELSON, PETITIONER,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Chapman v. Chapman, 526 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …s and expert witness fees against her. I. 1885 FLORIDA CONSTITUTION A conveyance of homestead property pri- or to 1968 must be construed under article X of the 1885 Florida Constitution. Moore v. Moore, 237 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 240 So. 2d 644 (Fla.1970). The homestead language is contained in sections 1 and 4 of article X and reads as follows: SECTION 1. Exemption of homestead; extent. — A homestead to the extent of one hundred and sixty acres of land, or the half of one acre within the…
• Gregory v. Gregory, 289 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …r in the hundreds. In many instances, e. g., Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. King, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 294; Maine Ins. Co. v. Raser, Fla.App.1970, 240 So. 2d 163; Reichek v. Fla. Bond & Mortgage Co., Fla.App.1970, 237 So. 2d 83, cert. denied, Fla.1970, 240 So. 2d 644, it would seem that any arguable obstacle to a consideration of the case on its merits caused by the non-existence of documents or portions of transcripts in the appellate record could have been overcome by a simple order, or even a telephone call t…
• Otto v. Sigmund, Jr., 631 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …because the deceased had previously conceded, in a dissolution proceeding, that the property in question was subject to equitable distribution, this argument is also without merit. In Moore v. Moore, 237 So. 2d 217, 220 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 240 So. 2d 644 (Fla.1970), the court cited previously established case law holding that a “constitutional or statutory prohibition cannot be given the breath of life by estoppel.” In Moore, the husband had alleged in a dissolution proceeding that certain property…

Authorities Cited

• Nelson v. State, 238 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)