UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
v.
WARD
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
WARD
525 U.S. 928
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1999)…The Court of Appeals also held that materiality is not an element of the mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud statutes, and thus the District Court did not err in failing to submit the question of materiality to the jury. We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 928 (1998), to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals on two questions: (1) whether, and under what circumstances, the omission of an element from the judge’s charge to the jury can be harmless error, and (2) whether materiality is an element of th…
-
EL Paso Natural GAS Co. v. Neztsosie, 526 U.S. 473 (U.S. 1999)…ainst litigating Price-Anderson Act claims in tribal court should be treated as law of the case, that all of the tribal-law claims were actually Price-Anderson Act claims, and that exhaustion was not required. Id., at 620-622. We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 928 (1998), and now vacate and remand. * — I > — ( There is one matter preliminary to the principal issue. Because respondents did not appeal those portions of the District Court’s orders enjoining them from pursuing Price-Anderson Act claims in Triba…