IN RE LOWE; IN RE LOWE; AND IN RE LOWE

Citator

Cited By

• Kolstad v. Am. Dental Ass'n, 527 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1999)
  …chiefly on § 1981a’s structure as evidence of a congressional intent to “limi[t] punitive damages to exceptional cases.” Id., at 970. Judge Tatel wrote in dissent for five judges, who agreed generally with the panel majority. We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 960 (1998), to resolve a conflict among the Federal Courts of Appeals concerning the circumstances under which a jury may consider a request for punitive damages under § 1981a(b)(1). Compare 139 F. 3d 958 (CADC 1998) (case below), with Luciano v. Olsten…
• Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344 (U.S. 1999)
  …ds “receipt ... or otherwise.” Id., at 1397-1398 (emphasis deleted). Because lower courts have divided on the question whether service of process is a prerequisite for the running of the 30-day removal period under § 1446(b),2 we granted certiorari. 525 U. S. 960 (1998). [*350] II Service of process, under longstanding tradition in our system of justice, is fundamental to any procedural imposition on a named defendant. At common law, the writ of capias ad respondendum directed the sheriff to secure the defe…
• Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 527 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1999)
  …such circumstances, see FLRA v. United States Dept. of Justice, 137 F. 3d 683 (CA2 1997); United States Dept. of Justice v. FLRA, 39 F. 3d 361 (CADC 1994); Defense Criminal Investigative Serv. v. FLRA, 855 F. 2d 93 (CA3 1988), we granted certiorari. 525 U. S. 960 (1998). HH 1 — 1 The FSLMRS provides, in relevant part, “(2) An exclusive representative of an appropriate unit in an agency shall be given the opportunity to be represented at— “(B) any examination of an employee in the unit by a representative…