KEESLING
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1998-11-02
No. 98-5792
525 U.S. 968 Supreme Court of the United States (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ighed the mitigating and aggravating circumstances and that Boyd’s death sentence was proportional to the penalties imposed in similar cases. Id. at 856. The United States Supreme Court denied Boyd’s petition for writ of certiorari. Boyd v. Alabama, 525 U.S. 968, 119 S.Ct. 416, 142 L.Ed.2d 338 (1998). C. State Post-Conviction Relief On October 20, 1999, Boyd, now employing new counsel, filed a motion for relief from his conviction and sentence pursuant to Rule 32 of the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure.…
  • …ry’s recommendation and sentenced Boyd to death by electrocution. ⅛ at 832. Boyd’s conviction and death sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, see id. at 852, aff'd sub nom. Ex parte Boyd, 715 So. 2d 852 (Ala. 1998), cert. denied, Boyd v. Alabama, 525 U.S. 968, 119 S.Ct. 416, 142 L.Ed.2d 338 (1998), and his Rule 32 petition for state post-conviction relief was denied, see Boyd v. State, 913 So. 2d 1113 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003), cert. denied, No. 1030438 (Ala. May 27, 2005). Boyd then sought federal habeas…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw