ROSENTHAL

v.

BANKS, ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS JUDGE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Citator

Cited By

• Thompson v. State, 759 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 2000)
  …ness concerning the availability of witness Savage. However, the trial court is not required to grant a motion to disqualify just because the defense would like to call the State as a witness. See Scott v. State, 717 So. 2d 908 (Fla.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 972, 119 S.Ct. 425, 142 L.Ed.2d 346 (1998). Thompson also claims that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to control persons.in the courtroom observing the trial. However, the record reflects that the jury was removed immediately after unknown…
• C.J. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 756 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
  …oss-examine. We address each argument in turn. “The decision to grant or deny a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Gore v. State, 599 So. 2d 978, 984 (Fla.1992); Scott v. State, 717 So. 2d 908, 911 (Fla.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 972, 119 S.Ct. 425, 142 L.Ed.2d 346 (1998). Such a decision will be reversed only upon a showing of an abuse of that discretion. Id. See also D.B. v. Department of Children & Families, 742 So. 2d 275, 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Fredrick v. State Dep’t of…
• J.W. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 835 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
  …001). Appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to continue. A court’s decision to grant or deny a continuance is reviewed on appeal using an abuse of discretion standard. Scott v. State, 717 So. 2d 908 (Fla.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 972, 119 S.Ct. 425, 142 L.Ed.2d 346 (1998); Gore v. State, 599 So. 2d 978 (Fla.1992); see also C.J. v. Department of Children & Families, 756 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). In Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980), the Florida Suprem…