PITSONBARGER

v.

GRAMLEY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Sergeant Michael Tindel v. Kessler, 772 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …order which determines that the defendants, as a matter of law, cannot raise the immunity defense. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(viii); see also Vermette v. Ludwig, 707 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), rev. denied, 717 So. 2d 534 (Fla.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 984, 119 S.Ct. 449, 142 L.Ed.2d 403 (1998). Otherwise, as the supreme court noted in Hastings, the denial of the motion may be based on a factual dispute in which the defendants may still likely be able to present an immunity defense to the jury. In or…
• Fernez v. Calabrese, 760 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …there is an adequate remedy available by appeal after final judgment. See generally Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097 (Fla.1987); Vermette v. Ludwig, 707 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), rev. denied, 717 So. 2d 534 (Fla.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 984, 119 S.Ct. 449, 142 L.Ed.2d 403 (1998); South Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Dupont By and Through Dupont, 683 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Barber v. Wonderland Greyhound Park, 656 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Chase Federal Bank v. Kim, 604 So. 2d 90…