FLORIDA

v.

WHITE

Citator

Cited By

• Neina Blizzard v. Appliance Direct, Inc., 16 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
  …y protected activity; (2) that he or she suffered adverse employment actitm; and (3) that the adverse employment action was causally related to the protected activity. See Harper v. Blockbuster Entm’t Corp., 139 F. 3d 1385 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1000, 119 S.Ct. 509, 142 L.Ed.2d 422 (1998). Once the plaintiff makes a prima facie showing, the burden shifts and the defendant must articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. Wells v. Colorado Dep’t of Transp.,…
• Martin v. Hadix, 527 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1999)
  …8) (holding that PLRA limits fees for work performed after effective date of Act, and suggesting in dicta that it does not apply to work performed prior to effective date), cert. pending, No. 98-917. We granted certiorari to resolve these conflicts. 525 U. S. 1000 (1998). In this Court, the Radix and Glover plaintiffs are respondents, and the defendant prison officials from both cases are petitioners. II Petitioners contend that the PLRA applies to Glover and Radix, eases that were pending when the PLRA was…
• Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1999)
  …d 397 (CA4 1982); United States v. Bush, 647 F. 2d 357 (CA3 1981). But see United States v. Dixon, 1 F. 3d 1080 (CA10 1993); United States v. Lasanta, 978 F. 2d 1300 (CA2 1992); United States v. Linn, 880 F. 2d 209 (CA9 1989). We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 1000 (1998), and now reverse. * * * * * The Fourth Amendment guarantees “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” and further provides that "no Warrants shall iss…