IN RE DISBARMENT OF BERG, KERBY
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY OF VIRGINIA ET AL.; WIRTZ, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WHITLEY, ET AL. V. SWITZER; K & K CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL. V. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ET AL.; BELIN V. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ET AL.; WATTS V. CALDERA, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL.; CARROLL V. BLACK ET AL.; GREEN ET AL. V. CITY OF BOSTON ET AL.; KOKORALEIS V. GILMORE, WARDEN; BALDWIN V. LOUISIANA, IN RE CAMPBELL, PRENTICE V. INFORMATION RESOURCES, INC.; SOLIS V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL., IN RE SEATON, WILLIAMS V. LOUISIANA, IN RE FARRELL, MCEVOY V. HOAG; RICHMOND V. NORTH CAROLINA; TUCKER V. BARTON ET AL.; CUMMINGS V. STEWART, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; COATES V. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PETERSON V. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; STEWART V. HECHINGER STORES CO.; WILLIAMS V. UNITED STATES, IN RE TASBY, JORDAN V. UNITED STATES; WARD V. GENERAL MOTORS NATIONAL RETIREMENT SERVICE; TONUBBEE V. RIVER PARISHES GUIDE ET AL., IN RE WAPNICK, KING V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; KEENAN V. OHIO; TIZER V. MONTGOMERY COUNTY ORPHANS' COURT, IN RE THOMPSON, BELL V. UNITED STATES; WALCZAK V. MASSACHUSETTS STATE RETIREMENT BOARD; KING V. FREEDMAN ET AL., IN RE HENDERSON, SMITH V. UNITED STATES; KING V. ELSER; SASSOWER V. MANGANO, PRESIDING JUSTICE OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; BERG V. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA; SPETH V. CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORP. ET AL.; GARCIA-ABREGO V. UNITED STATES; POLYAK V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT; BERG V. KOZLOFF; TYLER V. CHILES, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL., IN RE ATKINSON, ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING CO. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; SWANSON V. UNITED STATES; ROBERTSON V. LOUISIANA; MILLER ET AL. V. LORAIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.; MEASE V. BOWERSOX, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; ZIEBARTH V. AGRIBANK, FCB, IN RE SWANSON, GILLIES V. STEWART, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CAPPS V. CALIFORNIA; BARLEY-COOKE V. EDISON ET AL.; ARONOVSKY V. NGUYEN ET AL.; SINGLETON V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COOMBS V. SOBINA, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT SOMERSET, ET AL. (TWO JUDGMENTS); SCOTT V. UNITED STATES; MOLIN V. THE TRENTONIAN ET AL.; CHHORN V. WEST, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; OUTLAW V. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, IN RE VARELA, COOK V. MILLS, WARDEN, ET AL.; DREAD V. MARYLAND STATE POLICE; KAZANDJIAN V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON V. COGGINS ET AL.; ENAND V. AHMAD ET AL.; DUNCAN V. CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; HIGLEY V. UNITED STATES; GUNNELL V. LAZAROFF, WARDEN; PERRY V. HENDERSON, POSTMASTER GENERAL; MCKINNEY V. UNITED STATES; DEMPSEY V. UNITED STATES; TROBAUGH V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1998-11-30
Nos. D-1958; No. 97-1890; No. 97-1912; No. 97-1957; No. 97-1990; No. 97-2034; No. 97-2065; No. 97-2075; No. 97-8701; No. 97-8918; No. 97-8930; No. 97-8963; No. 97-9027; No. 97-9090; No. 97-9154; No. 97-9256; No. 97-9290; No. 97-9292; No. 97-9293; No. 97-9363; No. 97-9364; No. 97-9376; No. 97-9392; No. 97-9413; No. 97-9441; No. 97-9467; No. 97-9543; No. 97-9551; No. 97-9554; No. 97-9556; No. 97-9591; No. 97-9629; No. 97-9630; No. 97-9649; No. 97-9654; No. 97-9658; No. 97-9676; No. 97-9678; No. 97-9684; No. 98-106; No. 98-159; No. 98-210; No. 98-234; No. 98-240; No. 98-273; No. 98-274; No. 98-330; No. 98-435; No. 98-5007; No. 98-5026; No. 98-5055; No. 98-5133; No. 98-5149; No. 98-5152; No. 98-5166; No. 98-5178; No. 98-5290; No. 98-5293; No. 98-5369; No. 98-5373; No. 98-5386; No. 98-5419; No. 98-5459; No. 98-5519; No. 98-5548; No. 98-5551; No. 98-5557; No. 98-5578; No. 98-5579; No. 98-5605; No. 98-5612; No. 98-5646; No. 98-5667; No. 98-5783; No. 98-5795; No. 98-5828; No. 98-6085
525 U.S. 1033 Supreme Court of the United States (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This document is a Supreme Court orders list containing dispositions of petitions for certiorari and other motions across numerous cases from November 1998, with citations to the opinions or orders issued in each matter. The Court either granted, denied, or otherwise disposed of the petitions without issuing substantive opinions on the merits of the cases listed.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 802; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 817; No. 97-1957. No. 97-1990. No. 97-2034. No. 97-2065. No. 97-2075. No. 97-8701. No. 97-8918. No. 97-8930. No. 97-8963. No. 97-9027. No. 97-9090. No. 97-9154. No. 97-9256. No. 97-9290. No. 97-9292. No. 97-9293. No. 97-9363. No. 97-9364. No. 97-9376. No. 97-9392. No. 97-9413. No. 97-9441. No. 97-9467. No. 97-9543. No. 97-9551. No. 97-9554. ante, p. 819; ante, p. 822; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 827; ante, p. 829; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 807; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 807; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 847; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 807; No. 97-9556. No. 97-9591. No. 97-9629. No. 97-9630. No. 97-9649. No. 97-9654. No. 97-9658. No. 97-9676. No. 97-9678. No. 97-9684. No. 98-106. No. 98-159. No. 98-210. No. 98-234. No. 98-240. No. 98-273. No. 98-274. No. 98-330. No. 98-435. No. 98-5007. No. 98-5026. No. 98-5055. No. 98-5133. No. 98-5149. No. 98-5152. No. 98-5166. No. 98-5178. No. 98-5290. ante, p. 858; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 807; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 865; ante, p. 807; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 872; ante, p. 875; ante, p. 877; ante, p. 878; ante, p. 878; ante, p. 931; ante, p. 931; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 932; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 888; ante, p. 888; ante, p. 807; ante, p. 889; ante, p. 890; ante, p. 897; No. 98-5293. No. 98-5369. No. 98-5373. No. 98-5386. No. 98-5419. No. 98-5459. No. 98-5519. No. 98-5548. No. 98-5551. No. 98-5557. No. 98-5578. No. 98-5579. No. 98-5605. No. 98-5612. No. 98-5646. No. 98-5667. No. 98-5783. No. 98-5795. No. 98-5828. No. 98-6085. ante, p. 897; ante, p. 901; ante, p. 901; ante, p. 902; ante, p. 904; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 909; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 935; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 935; ante, p. 935; ante, p. 912; ante, p. 914; ante, p. 937; ante, p. 917; ante, p. 918; ante, p. 938; and ante, p. 942. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656 (U.S. 2001)
    …under Teague because dictated by their own precedent, cf. Dyer v. Calderon, 151 F. 3d 970, 993-995 (CA9) (en banc) (O’Scannlain, J., dissenting) (rejecting proposition that lower court decisions can establish rule for Teague purposes), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 1033 (1998); Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F. 3d 944, 955, n. 11 (CA8 1997) (assuming, without deciding, that only Supreme Court precedent may dictate rule so that it is not new for Teague purposes), cert, denied, 523 U. S. 1088 (1998), or when lower courts have…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw