IN RE MASON
IN RE MASON
525 U.S. 1039
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon OIL Co., 526 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1999)…d a difficult issue of first impression, its personal jurisdiction challenge raised “[n]o substantial questions of purely state law,” and “could be resolved relatively easily in [Ruhrgas’] favor.” 145 F. 3d, at 232-233. [*583] We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 1039 (1998), to resolve a conflict between the Circuits7 and now reverse. HH HH HH Steel Co. held that Article III generally requires a federal court to satisfy itself of its jurisdiction over the subject matter before it considers the merits of a ease…
-
Jefferson Cnty. v. Acker, 527 U.S. 423 (U.S. 1999)…520 U. S. 1261 (1997). On remand, the Eleventh Circuit adhered to its prior en bane decision. See 137 F. 3d 1314, 1324 (1998) (en banc). We again granted certiorari to consider both the threshold Tax Injunction Act issue and the merits of the case. 525 U. S. 1039-1040 (1998). We take up as well an anterior question raised by the Solicitor General: Was removal from state court to federal court unauthorized by the federal officer removal statute? II The federal officer removal provision at issue states: “(a…