CAROL ORSBORN AND KEITH ORSBORN, HER HUSBAND, AND KEITH ORSBORN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
SIDNEY GOULD, ESTATE OF, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-11-24
No. 70-299
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
241 So. 2d 450 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of § 734.29, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pizzi v. Cent. Bank & Tr. Co., 250 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 1971)
    …s granted to review the Third District Court of Appeal’s 2-1 per curiam affirmance of the trial court’s dismissal of a second amended complaint in favor of respondent Central Bank and Trust Company. Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust Co., Fla.App.1970, 241 So. 2d 450. Although the District Court majority did not issue a written opinion stating the reasons for its affirmance, this Court has conflict certiorari jurisdiction over the cause. We have granted certiorari in similar cases where an examination of the co…
  • Pizzi v. Cent. Bank & Tr. Co., 251 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on December 1, 1970 (241 So. 2d 450) affirming the order of dismissal of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 30, 1971…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw