DANIEL LARRY PIZZI AND SHERIAN PIZZI, APPELLANTS,

v.

CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A BANKING CORPORATION, CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEES FOR DAVID L. HUSMAN AND WIFE, AND DAVID L. HUSMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND STANLEY MATUSOW, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BYRON HOLDING CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-12-01

No. 70-300

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

241 So. 2d 450 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

*451PEARSON, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent upon the basis of the rule stated in Kest v. Nathanson, Fla. App.1968, 216 So.2d 233.

Dissent

PEARSON, Chief Judge

[*451] PEARSON, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent upon the basis of the rule stated in Kest v. Nathanson, Fla. App.1968, 216 So. 2d 233.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Pizzi v. Cent. Bank & Tr. Co., 250 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 1971)

…s granted to review the Third District Court of Appeal’s 2-1 per curiam affirmance of the trial court’s dismissal of a second amended complaint in favor of respondent Central Bank and Trust Company. Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust Co., Fla.App.1970, 241 So. 2d 450. Although the District Court majority did not issue a written opinion stating the reasons for its affirmance, this Court has conflict certiorari jurisdiction over the cause. We have granted certiorari in similar cases where an examination of the co…
Pizzi v. Cent. Bank & Tr. Co., 251 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)

…PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on December 1, 1970 (241 So. 2d 450) affirming the order of dismissal of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 30, 1971…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw