ANGELIKA Y. LASSETER, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN A. LASSETER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-11-24
No. 70-34
Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
241 So. 2d 455 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, wife, appeals a final judgment of divorce and assigns as error the amount of child support and the amount of attorney’s fees allowed. In addition she assigns as error the denial of her prayer for permanent alimony. We have reviewed the record and find that in each instance the appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion vested in the trial judge. Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 54; Cf. Farr v. Farr, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 890.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • VAN Dyck v. VAN Dyck, 252 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
    …y awarded. Having examined the briefs and listened to the arguments of the parties, no clear abuse of the trial judge’s discretion has been shown. We therefore affirm. Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 54, Lasseter v. Lasseter, Fla.App.1970, 241 So. 2d 455 and Farr v. Farr, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 890. Affirmed. CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and REED, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw