OLMSTEAD, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, ET AL.
v.
L. C., BY ZIMRING, GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL.
OLMSTEAD, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, ET AL.
L. C., BY ZIMRING, GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL.
525 U.S. 1054
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2000)…er Co., 206 F. 3d 420, 429 (CA4 2000); Galabya v. New York City Bd. of Ed., 202 F. 3d 636, 639 (CA2 2000); Hall v. Giant Food, Inc., 175 F. 3d 1074, 1077-1078 (CADC 1999); Beaird v. Seagate Technology Inc., 145 F. 3d 1159, 1165 (CA10), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 1054 (1998); Hindman v. Transkrit Corp., 145 F. 3d 986, 990-991 (CA8 1998); Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 135 F. 3d 1428, 1432 (CA11), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 962 (1998); Keller v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.; 130 F. 3d 1101, 1108 (CA31997) (en ban…
-
Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (U.S. 1999)…in community-based care would be unreason [*596] able given the demands of the State’s mental health budget.” 138 F. 3d, at 905.7 We granted certiorari in view of the importance of the question presented to the States and affected individuals. See 525 U. S. 1054 (1998).8 III Endeavoring to carry out Congress’ instruction to issue regulations implementing Title II, the Attorney General, in the integration and reasonable-modifications regulations, see supra, at 591-592, made two key determinations. The firs…