KELLER
v.
LINDSEY, WARDEN
KELLER
LINDSEY, WARDEN
525 U.S. 1058
Supreme Court of the United States (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mitchel Westerheide v. State, 767 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…e [the State’s] intention to deem it ‘civil.’ ” Kendricks, 521 U.S. at 361, 117 S.Ct. 2072. The Florida courts apply a similar two-prong test. See Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 722 So. 2d 192 (Fla.), and cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1058, 119 S.Ct. 624, 142 L.Ed.2d 563 (1998).4 [*645] In ascertaining the legislative intent under the first prong of the test, the Court in Hendricks examined the legislature’s description of the act as a “civil commitment procedure” and noted the placem…1 / 3
-
Davis v. State, 928 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…Constitutions apply to criminal proceedings, not civil proceedings. See Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 117 S.Ct. 2072, 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997); Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla.2d DCA 1998), rev. denied, 722 So. 2d 192 (Fla.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1058, 119 S.Ct. 624, 142 L.Ed.2d 563 (1998).…