FRED LEE MARSHALL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRED LEE MARSHALL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
241 So. 2d 719
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1970)
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
*720WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.
(dissenting):
I would reverse because of the failure of the State to prove that the defendant stole a 19S7 Lincoln automobile, Serial No. 57WA147302, Florida Tag 17 M 115, from its owner C. E. Williams, d/b/a C & J Motors, as charged. The defendant is entitled to a reversal and a new trial upon the principles announced in Morgan v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 186 So.2d 795 and Carson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 340.
Dissent
WALDEN, Judge
(dissenting):
I would reverse because of the failure of the State to prove that the defendant stole a 19S7 Lincoln automobile, Serial No. 57WA147302, Florida Tag 17 M 115, from its owner C. E. Williams, d/b/a C & J Motors, as charged. The defendant is entitled to a reversal and a new trial upon the principles announced in Morgan v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 186 So. 2d 795 and Carson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 205 So. 2d 340.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Morgan v. State, 186 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Jones v. Broward Cnty., 205 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)