AHMAD
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1999-01-19
No. 98-7277
525 U.S. 1113 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Bravo, 203 F.3d 778 (11th Cir. 2000)
    …osed. “In undertaking this first step, only the amended guideline is changed. All other guideline application decisions made during the original sentencing remain intact.” United States v. Vautier, 144 F. 3d 756, 760 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1113, 119 S.Ct. 888, 142 L.Ed.2d 786 (1999) (citing U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b), comment n.2). The district court correctly performed this portion of its task, finding that, under the revised guidelines, Bravo would have had a base level of 38, which, after ag…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw