FALGE

v.

APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Citator

Cited By

• Doughty v. Apfel, 245 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …936 F. 2d 1143, 1145 (11th Cir.1991). When, as in this ease, the ALJ denies benefits and the AC denies review, we review the ALJ’s decision as the Commissioner’s final decision. See Falge v. Apfel, 150 F. 3d 1320, 1322 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1124, 119 S.Ct. 907, 142 L.Ed.2d 905 (1999). The Commissioner’s factual findings are conclusive if they are supported by “substantial evidence,” consisting of “such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion…
• Vega v. Comm'r OF Soc. Sec., 265 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir. 2001)
  ….1986). IV.DISCUSSION A. Initially, we note the parties disagree about the jurisdiction of this court to review the issue of whether a remand is necessary in light of new evidence. In Falge v. Apfel, 150 F. 3d 1320 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1124, 119 S.Ct. 907, 142 L.Ed.2d 905 (1999), this court stated that “42 U.S.C. § 405(g) permits courts to remand a case to the Social Security Administration for consideration of newly discovered evidence.” Id. at 1323. Thus, this court has jurisdictio…
• Hernandez v. Barnhart, 203 F. Supp. 2d 1341 (S.D. Fla. 2002)