IN RE LAUSLEGA, DUNN

v.

ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY ET AL.; LESOON V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; BYBEE ET UX. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; TROST V. UNITED STATES; PICKETT V. WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL.; ATHERTON V. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JACKSON V. MILLIKEN; WHITFIELD V. TEXAS (THREE JUDGMENTS); TAYLOR V. HANKS, SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE; R. A. D. V. ILLINOIS; GONZALEZ V. CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, DBA L'IL ABNER MOBILE HOME PARK; BENNETT V. TEXAS; DECKARD, AKA VALE V. UNITED STATES; FLORES V. UNITED STATES; CUNNINGHAM V. HEUSZEL, WARDEN, ET AL.; HAMMONS V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Les A. Kushner v. Engelberg, Cantor & Leone, P.A., 750 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …, Senior Judge, concur. . The appellees rely on the 1995 version of the statute. However, in this case, if the fee were calculated by statute, the 1993 statute would apply. See Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So. 2d 356, 363-64 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1187, 119 S.Ct. 1133, 143 L.Ed.2d 126 (1999).…
• State v. Barry S. Franklin & Assocs., P.A., 841 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …describing the specific acts of bad faith conduct that resulted in the unnecessary incurrence of attorneys’ fees”); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So. 2d 356, 365 (Fla.1998)(holding that inequitable conduct doctrine is rarely applicable), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1187, 119 S.Ct. 1133, 143 L.Ed.2d 126 (1999). As such, we reverse the award of attorney’s fees in favor of the appellee. Based on the disposition of the above issue, we do not reach the remaining arguments raised by the appellants. Reversed.…