CUETO
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1999-03-22
No. 98-825
526 U.S. 1016 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (U.S. 2000)
    …uld be the group to decide who the trustees ought to be.” Ibid. The court so held notwithstanding its clear holding that the Hawaii Constitution and implementing statutes “contain a racial classification on their face.” Ibid. We granted certiorari, 526 U. S. 1016 (1999), and now reverse. III The purpose and command of the Fifteenth Amendment are set forth in language both explicit and comprehensive. [*512] The National Government and the States may not violate a fundamental principle: They may not deny or…
  • Portuondo v. Agard, 529 U.S. 61 (U.S. 2000)
    …ed order. A divided panel of the Second Circuit reversed, holding that the prosecutor’s comments violated respondent’s Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. 117 F. 3d 696 (1997), rehearing denied, 159 F. 3d 98 (1998). We granted certiorari. 526 U. S. 1016 (1999). II Respondent contends that the prosecutor’s comments on his presence and on the ability to fabricate that it afforded him unlawfully burdened his Sixth Amendment right to be present at trial and to be confronted with the witnesses against…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw