IN RE: ADVISORY OPINION TO GOVERNOR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court issued an advisory opinion to Governor Fred P. Cone interpreting the constitutional and statutory terms of office for the Judge of the Criminal Court of Record and County Solicitor for Escambia County, holding that both offices operate on four-year terms beginning with the first appointment rather than with each subsequent commission.
The Court held that under Sections 24 and 27 of Article V of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 3735, Acts of 1887, the term of office for both positions is four years running in four-year cycles beginning with the first appointment, with the law—not the individual commissions—determining the terms of office. Accordingly, the judge's current term expires August 17, 1939, and the County Solicitor's term expires August 19, 1939, and the Governor may appoint replacements for the new four-year terms commencing on those dates.
“The terms of both offices accordingly run in four year cycles and begin with the first appointment. The law and not the commission determines the terms of the office.”
Establishes the fundamental principle that statutory law, not individual commissions, determines the duration and cycles of office for these constitutional positions.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe first judge of the Criminal Court of Record for Escambia County was commissioned August 17, 1887, and the first County Solicitor was commissioned …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constitutional Provisions cases and more on FLexlaw
*299Governor Fred P. Cone
Tallahass'ee, Florida
My Dear Governor:
We have your communication of April Í9 as follows:
“May I respectfully request your opinion affecting my executive powers and duties in respect to the matter herein related ?
“The first judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Escambia County, Florida, appointed under the provisons of Section 24 of Article V of the Constitution, and Chapter 3735, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1887, was commissioned August 17, 1887, and the first County Solicitor for said County appointed under the provisions of Section 27 of Article V of the Constitution, and Chapter 3735, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1887, was commissioned August 19, 1887. The last commission issued to the Judge of said Court was dated July 9, 1938, to run ‘until next Senate/ and» the last commission issued to. the County Solicitor of Escambia County, Florida, was' dated June 3, 1937, to run until June 20, 1941. If the terms of these respective offices run for four years beginning with the date of the first commission issued to the respective officers, irrespective of the commissions issued subsequent thereto, the office of the Judge of Said Court will be vacant August 17, 1939, and the office of County Solicitor of Escambia County will be vacant August 19, 1939.
“The question on which I desire your opinion, therefore, is whether I should appoint a Judge of the Court of Record in and for Escambia County, Florida, to hold office ‘for a term of four years beginning August 17, 1939, and a County *300Solicitor for Escambia County to hold office for a term of four years beginning August 19, 1939.’ ”
You are advised that under Sections 24 and 27 Article V of the Constitution and Chapter 3735, Acts of 1887, the term of office of Judge of the Criminal Court of Record and County Solicitor for Escambia County is defined as four years. The terms of both offices' accordingly run in four year cycles and begin with the first appointment. The law and not the commission determines the terms of the office. Advisory opinion to Governor, 93 Fla. 102¿, 113 So. 115; State, ex rel. Landis, v. Bird, 120 Fla. 780. 163 So. 248; State, ex rel. Davis, v. Collins, 101 Fla. 371, 134 So. 595.
In this situation, the current term of the Judge of the Criminal Court of Record will expire August 17, 1939, and the current term of the County Solicitor will expire August 19, 1939. Since the last appointment of Judge of the Criminal Court was made July 9, 1938, to run to the “next Senate,” the Senate being now in ses'sion, a new appointment may be made for the remainder of the unexpired term and for the full four year term beginning August 17. 1939.
The last appointment of County Solicitor having been made June 3, 1937, to run until June 20, 1941, was good only until the next session of the Senate, which is the present session. Since the Senate is now in session, a new appointment may be made for the remainder of the unexpired term closing August 19, 1939, and for the full four year term beginning on that date.
Respectfully submitted,
Glenn Terrell Rivers Buford
J. B. Whitfield Roy PI. Chapman
Armstead Brown Elwyn Thomas
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 157 (Fla. 1941)…o hold until the end of the current cycle term, July 30, 1941; and also to make separate and distinct appointments for confirmation as such, circuit judges for the six- [*165] year term beginning July 30, 1941. See Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 137 Fla. 298, 188 So. 218. Very respectfully, Armstead Brown J. B. Whitfield Glenn Terrell Rivers Buford Elwyn Thomas Justices…
-
Advisory Opinion to Governor, 152 Fla. 686 (Fla. 1943)…eparate and distinct appointments; and therefore the subsequent appointee need not be the same individual as the ad interim appointee. See Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 147 Fla. 157, 2 So. (2nd) 378. See also in this connection Advisory Opinion, 137 Fla. 298, 188 So. 218. Of course these opinions were based on the Constitution and the statutes as then existing. At the time the contitutional amendment of 1942 (Section 46 of Article V) was adopted at the general election of 1942, Honorable H. L. Sebring…
-
In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 171 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1965)…also be stated that he is not bound by the term stated in the commission if, in fact, he is entitled to a longer term, since the law and not the commission determines the term of the office.” (Emphasis added.) Again in Advisory Opinion to Governor, 137 Fla. 298, 188 So. 218, the Justices said: “The law and not the commission determines the terms of the office.” Also in the same Advisory: “The last appointment of County Solicitor having been made June 3, 1937, to run until June 20, 1941, was good only un…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Bird, 120 Fla. 780 (Fla. 1935)
- In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 93 Fla. 1024 (Fla. 1927)
- State v. Collins, 101 Fla. 371 (Fla. 1931)