SCHLEIFER, A MINOR, BY SCHLEIFER, ET AL.

v.

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. T.M., 761 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
  …cuit observed that not every government restriction of a child’s freedom automatically [*1148] infringes upon a parent’s fundamental rights. See Schleifer ex rel. Schleifer v. City of Charlottesville, 159 F. 3d 843, 851 (4th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018, 119 S.Ct. 1252, 143 L.Ed.2d 349 (1999). Although certain areas of child rearing are protected as fundamental, the right to allow a juvenile to be in a public place late at night without adult supervision is not of such an intimate, personal family…
• van Poyck v. State, 116 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 2013)
  …(2) that his death sentence was unconstitutional because the judge and jury weighed invalid aggrava-tors; and (3) that he was convicted of nonexistent crimes. We denied habeas relief. Van Poyck v. Singletary, 715 So. 2d 930 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018, 119 S.Ct. 1252, 143 L.Ed.2d 349 (1999). Van Poyck filed his second state habeas petition in this Court in October 1998, wherein he argued that he was entitled to a belated direct appeal; we again denied relief. See Van Poyck v. Singletary, 728 So.…
• Ned Layton v. State, 790 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …oubt existed as to whether one or more of the jurors, to whom a cause challenge was denied, possessed an impartial state of mind, Van Poyck v. Singletary, 715 So. 2d 930, 931 (Fla.1998)(citing Hill v. State, 477 So. 2d 553 (Fla.1985)), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018, 119 S.Ct. 1252, 143 L.Ed.2d 349 (1999), and that this error was properly preserved. Reversed and remanded for a new trial.…