O'DELL
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1999-03-22
No. 98-8047
526 U.S. 1029 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Shedrick McDOWELL, 250 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …overnment’s manifest intention to do so, or (2) it was of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it as a comment on the defendant’s silence. See United States v. Exarhos, 135 F. 3d 723, 728 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1029, 119 S.Ct. 1275, 143 L.Ed.2d 369 (1999). The comment to which McDowell objects related to the forfeiture of his truck. During cross-examination of a Customs agent, McDowell’s counsel asked the agent the following: Q [Defense Counsel]: Regarding th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw