ANDREWS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1999-03-22
No. 98-8114
526 U.S. 1030 Supreme Court of the United States (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Probel, 214 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2000)
    …minor to have sex with him,” the court did not need to decide whether the enhancement would be appropriate in the absence of some form of benefit. Id. at 263 n. 4. Similarly, in United States v. Hibbler, 159 F. 3d 233 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1030, 119 S.Ct. 1278, 143 L.Ed.2d 372 (1999), the Sixth Circuit held that “the enhancement ... is not limited to instances involving distribution for pecuniary gain.” Id. at 237-38. The court followed Canada’s reasoning that the plain language of the gui…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw